Comparison
NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope vs NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope
The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope's 203mm collects 1.8× the light of the NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope's 150mm — about 0.7 magnitudes deeper on faint objects, and it splits doubles to 0.57″ against 0.77″. It costs $300 more.
| Spec | Celestron NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope | Celestron NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope |
|---|---|---|
| Best price | $2099 Amazon | $2399 Amazon |
| Aperture | 150 mm | 203 mm |
| $ per mm aperture | $13.99 | $11.81 |
| Type | Catadioptric | Catadioptric |
| Mount | GoTo | GoTo |
| Focal length | 1500 mm | 2032 mm |
| Focal ratio | f/10.0 | f/10.0 |
| Best for | Beginner, Visual, Planetary | Visual, Planetary |
| Amazon ↗ | Amazon ↗ |
Amazon listings: NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope → “NexStar Evolution 6, Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope Bundle with StarSense AutoAlign” · NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope → “NexStar Evolution 8 WiFi Enabled Computerized Telescope - 8” Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope SCT - Control via Smartphone App - 10-Hour Lithium Battery - iPhone and Android Compatible”
Which one to buy
The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope is the straightforward pick. It has the larger aperture and the better price per millimetre — $11.81/mm against $13.99/mm, about 15% better. You're not paying a premium for the extra glass; you're paying less per unit of it.
What you'd notice at the eyepiece
With the 25mm eyepiece most telescopes ship with, the NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope gives 60× and the NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope 81×. The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope's longer focal length magnifies harder on planets; the NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope shows a wider piece of sky, which is what you want for large nebulae and star clusters, and makes finding things easier. Try other eyepieces →
On the Moon and planets
Planets are bright, so this comes down to resolution and how much magnification the optics will carry before the image falls apart. The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope resolves to 0.57″ and takes about 406×; the NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope resolves 0.77″ and tops out near 300×. On a night of steady seeing that's a visible difference on Jupiter's belts and the Cassini division. On an average night the atmosphere, not the telescope, sets the limit — which is why the gap matters less here than the aperture numbers suggest.
On deep-sky objects
Faint objects are where aperture is the only thing that helps. The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope collects 1.8× the light and reaches about 0.7 magnitudes deeper — more galaxies within reach, and globular clusters that resolve into stars rather than staying a smudge.
Who each one suits
Both are catadioptric telescopes on the same GoTo mount, so the decision really is just aperture, price and whatever the brand adds around them. Both suit planetary and visual. The NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope is additionally set up for beginner.
Which to choose
- You mostly observe the Moon and planets. The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope — its 0.57″ resolution shows finer detail on a steady night.
- You're after faint galaxies and nebulae. The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope, and it isn't close — 1.8× the light is the whole game on faint objects.
- Budget is the binding constraint. The NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope, $300 less — and put the difference toward eyepieces, which you keep when you upgrade the telescope.
People also ask
- What is the difference between NexStar 6 and 8?
- Aperture and price. The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope is 203mm against 150mm, so it gathers 1.8× the light, and it costs $300 more.
Questions Google reports people actually asking about this comparison. Answered from our own specs and live prices — anything the data can't settle isn't listed rather than guessed at.
What this page can't tell you
Everything above comes from aperture, focal length and price — measurable things. It says nothing about how steady the mount is under load, whether the focuser has play, how good the supplied eyepieces are, or what support is like a year in. Those routinely matter more than a few millimetres of aperture, and the only honest source is people who own one.
Worth reading before you buy: owner reports on Cloudy Nights — a twenty-year archive of people describing what these actually do at the eyepiece.
Aperture decides light-gathering, so $/mm is the cleanest value measure — lower means more telescope per dollar. Compare any other two →