Comparison
Seestar S30 vs Seestar S50
The Seestar S50's 50mm collects 2.8× the light of the Seestar S30's 30mm — about 1.1 magnitudes deeper on faint objects, and it splits doubles to 2.32″ against 3.87″. It costs $274 more.
| Spec | ZWO Seestar S30 | ZWO Seestar S50 |
|---|---|---|
| Best price | $275 Mile High | $549 Astronomics |
| Aperture | 30 mm | 50 mm |
| $ per mm aperture | $9.17 | $10.98 |
| Type | Smart | Smart |
| Mount | GoTo | GoTo |
| Focal length | 150 mm | 250 mm |
| Focal ratio | f/5.0 | f/5.0 |
| Sensor | 2.1 MP | 2.1 MP |
| Best for | Astrophotography, Beginner, Visual | Astrophotography, Beginner, Visual |
| Amazon ↗ | Amazon ↗ |
Which one to buy
This is a genuine trade rather than an upgrade. The Seestar S50 gathers 2.8× the light, but at $10.98/mm it's dearer per millimetre than the Seestar S30 at $9.17/mm. Worth it if you're chasing faint objects, where aperture is the only thing that helps. Harder to justify if you mostly observe the Moon and planets, which are bright enough that the smaller scope shows them well.
How much sky each frames
Neither has an eyepiece — you view on a phone — so focal length decides how much sky lands on the sensor rather than magnification. At 150mm against 250mm, the Seestar S30 frames the wider field, which suits large nebulae and the Andromeda-sized targets that won't fit in a tighter frame. The Seestar S50 puts more pixels on smaller objects like galaxies and planetary nebulae.
The Seestar S30 weighs 1.65kg against 2.5kg — 1.5× lighter. That decides how often it actually gets carried outside, which matters more than any spec for a telescope that would otherwise stay in a cupboard.
On the Moon and planets
Planets are bright, so this comes down to resolution and how much magnification the optics will carry before the image falls apart. The Seestar S50 resolves to 2.32″ and takes about 100×; the Seestar S30 resolves 3.87″ and tops out near 60×. On a night of steady seeing that's a visible difference on Jupiter's belts and the Cassini division. On an average night the atmosphere, not the telescope, sets the limit — which is why the gap matters less here than the aperture numbers suggest.
On deep-sky objects
Faint objects are where aperture is the only thing that helps. The Seestar S50 collects 2.8× the light and reaches about 1.1 magnitudes deeper — more galaxies within reach, and globular clusters that resolve into stars rather than staying a smudge.
Who each one suits
Both are smart telescopes on the same GoTo mount, so the decision really is just aperture, price and whatever the brand adds around them. Both suit astrophotography, beginner and visual.
Where you can actually buy them
Amazon does not currently sell the Seestar S30 — its listing is there but unavailable. Mile High has it at $275. Amazon does not currently sell the Seestar S50 — its listing is there but unavailable. Astronomics has it at $549. This is normal for brands that sell mainly through astronomy dealers rather than Amazon, and it changes month to month — but it's worth knowing before you settle on one.
Which to choose
- You mostly observe the Moon and planets. The Seestar S50 — its 2.32″ resolution shows finer detail on a steady night.
- You're after faint galaxies and nebulae. The Seestar S50, and it isn't close — 2.8× the light is the whole game on faint objects.
- You'll carry it, or travel with it. The Seestar S30 at 1.65kg. A telescope you take outside beats a better one you don't.
- Budget is the binding constraint. The Seestar S30, $274 less — and it's also the better value per millimetre of aperture.
Related comparisons
What this page can't tell you
Everything above comes from aperture, focal length and price — measurable things. It says nothing about how steady the mount is under load, whether the focuser has play, how good the supplied eyepieces are, or what support is like a year in. Those routinely matter more than a few millimetres of aperture, and the only honest source is people who own one.
Worth reading before you buy: owner reports on Cloudy Nights — a twenty-year archive of people describing what these actually do at the eyepiece.
Aperture decides light-gathering, so $/mm is the cleanest value measure — lower means more telescope per dollar. Compare any other two →