🔭 TelescopePrices

Comparison

Seestar S30 Pro vs Seestar S50

The Seestar S50's 50mm collects 2.8× the light of the Seestar S30 Pro's 30mm — about 1.1 magnitudes deeper on faint objects, and it splits doubles to 2.32″ against 3.87″. It costs $150 less.

Spec ZWO Seestar S30 Pro ZWO Seestar S50
Best price $699 Amazon $549 Astronomics
Aperture 30 mm 50 mm
$ per mm aperture $23.3 $10.98
TypeSmartSmart
MountGoToGoTo
Focal length 150 mm 250 mm
Focal ratio f/5.0 f/5.0
Sensor 2.1 MP 2.1 MP
Best for Astrophotography, Beginner, Visual Astrophotography, Beginner, Visual
Amazon ↗ Amazon ↗

Which one to buy

The Seestar S50 is the straightforward pick. It has the larger aperture and the better price per millimetre — $10.98/mm against $23.3/mm, about 52% better. You're not paying a premium for the extra glass; you're paying less per unit of it.

How much sky each frames

Neither has an eyepiece — you view on a phone — so focal length decides how much sky lands on the sensor rather than magnification. At 150mm against 250mm, the Seestar S30 Pro frames the wider field, which suits large nebulae and the Andromeda-sized targets that won't fit in a tighter frame. The Seestar S50 puts more pixels on smaller objects like galaxies and planetary nebulae.

The Seestar S30 Pro weighs 1.7kg against 2.5kg — 1.5× lighter. That decides how often it actually gets carried outside, which matters more than any spec for a telescope that would otherwise stay in a cupboard.

On the Moon and planets

Planets are bright, so this comes down to resolution and how much magnification the optics will carry before the image falls apart. The Seestar S50 resolves to 2.32″ and takes about 100×; the Seestar S30 Pro resolves 3.87″ and tops out near 60×. On a night of steady seeing that's a visible difference on Jupiter's belts and the Cassini division. On an average night the atmosphere, not the telescope, sets the limit — which is why the gap matters less here than the aperture numbers suggest.

On deep-sky objects

Faint objects are where aperture is the only thing that helps. The Seestar S50 collects 2.8× the light and reaches about 1.1 magnitudes deeper — more galaxies within reach, and globular clusters that resolve into stars rather than staying a smudge.

Who each one suits

Both are smart telescopes on the same GoTo mount, so the decision really is just aperture, price and whatever the brand adds around them. Both suit astrophotography, beginner and visual.

Where you can actually buy them

Amazon does not currently sell the Seestar S50 — its listing is there but unavailable. Astronomics has it at $549. This is normal for brands that sell mainly through astronomy dealers rather than Amazon, and it changes month to month — but it's worth knowing before you settle on one.

Which to choose

Related comparisons

What this page can't tell you

Everything above comes from aperture, focal length and price — measurable things. It says nothing about how steady the mount is under load, whether the focuser has play, how good the supplied eyepieces are, or what support is like a year in. Those routinely matter more than a few millimetres of aperture, and the only honest source is people who own one.

Worth reading before you buy: owner reports on Cloudy Nights — a twenty-year archive of people describing what these actually do at the eyepiece.

Aperture decides light-gathering, so $/mm is the cleanest value measure — lower means more telescope per dollar. Compare any other two →